1:46 PM. I got to the venue about twenty minutes before the band did. Enough time to feel nerveous again and walk around the room a little, figure out where I wanted to be and remind myself that I did in-fact remember how the cameras work.
When the van pulled in Dimitri jumped out almost immediately and came over to say hello. From there everything started moving inside. Cases, amps, drums, ect ect.
Soundcheck started and I began taking photos, working my way around the room while they figured out levels and tried to account for the slapback in a space that big. I always like this part. Before doors, before there is an audience to perform toward, when songs are still being stopped halfway through and somebody is asking for more of something in the monitor. For a little while you get a concert almost entirely to yourself.
There was something especially strange about watching it happen with these songs.
Horse Jumper of Love were here to play their self-titled debut in its entirety, ten years after the record first came out. A record made by three much younger people in Boston, before any of them could have known what those songs were eventually going to mean to people.
Ten years is enough time for a record to start accumulating evidence.
Below in conversation with Dimitri Giannopoulos of Horse Jumper of Love we talk about what survived, what changed, and what happens when you pick up a record you made ten years ago and play the whole thing again.
The anniversary edition has so much physical evidence from that period tucked inside it, old photographs, drawings, handwritten lyrics, tabs, pieces from early tours. Did you always have the instinct that this stuff was worth keeping, or when the ten-year release came up did it become a search through drawers, boxes, hard drives, and other people's apartments to figure out what had somehow survived? And was there anything you found that actually changed the way you remembered that period?
I’m a bit of an emotional hoarder. I kept a lot of straight up trash. It’s relatively organized in several shoeboxes in my room. Each one is for a different era in my life and every so often I go through them to feel a pain in my heart. Just some examples: There’s an old candy wrapper from a chocolate eyeball, a piece of red string, a plastic finger, a bunch of receipts or ticket stubs I’ve kept even though most of the ink has faded. There’s notes of course. I don’t think the stuff is necessarily worth keeping. In fact probably because I hoard so much stuff, it has emotionally stunted me. Part of this album re-issue was about moving on, about going through all that shit with intention so I could finally see the other side of things I never did end up getting closure for. I was accepting that I wouldn't get closure. Nothing changed the way I remember that period but looking back on it with this much time between definitely put it into perspective. I put a lot of emotional weight on people from my past, but it was all me, I was the issue for putting so much meaning onto things.
I noticed a tiny thing while going through old interviews that I wanted to ask about. In that 2016 Allston Pudding piece, the early version of “i love you very much forever” is called “Heathen,” but on the anniversary record that 2013 recording is called “Heather.” Was “Heathen” actually an old title for it, or was that just something that got misprinted somewhere along the way? And now that “Heather” and “i love you very much forever” can actually exist next to each other on the same release, do they still feel like two versions of the same song to you, or have they become two completely different songs that just happen to share DNA?
“Heathen” was the original title. I changed it along the way because I didn’t want it to have a weird religious connotation. Religion played into things a bit then. I was a 19 year old virgin when I wrote it and it’s kind of a horny song, written through an immature lens. I lost my virginity a year later when I was 20 and changed the title to “Heather”. A bit of a melodramatic move..
To me they are two very different songs. I think ILYVMF is a lot cooler. I remember in 2012 when we were playing the song around Boston people really liked it, our friends coming to our shows did at least. I was writing really poppy music. I wanted to be a band like Vampire Weekend or Fleet Foxes when I was a teenager. If you ever find Jamie’s and my high school band, you’ll see what I mean. But then I got really into Swans (specifically ‘Soundtracks for the Blind’), MBV, and Atlas Sound. That changed everything for me.
The whole S/T record was kind of self sabotaging. When people liked what I was doing I wanted to do something else. Maybe I’m a contrarian. That’s why I slowed that shit down and made a raw album that wasn’t poppy anymore and I wanted that to somehow expose the wound childhood leaves on all of us growing up.
There’s also a slightly strange question of what the self-titled record actually is.
The original 2016 release was eight songs and ended with “i love you very much forever.” “Orange Peeler” came into later editions, and now the anniversary edition presents it as track nine. When “Orange Peeler” originally surfaced, you talked about it as an older song that was important because it helped the three of you learn how to play together, even though by then you weren’t sure it really represented the band anymore. Was that history part of why it felt important to keep “Orange Peeler” as part of the record for the anniversary edition rather than returning to the original eight-song version? At this point, does “Orange Peeler” feel like it was always part of the self-titled to you, or can you still remember the version of the album that existed without it?
Orange Peeler was similar to “Heather” in fact I think I wrote those in the same month. I was less embarrassed about it and actually was going to include it on the original release. I sent the album to someone I really admired and looked up to at the time before it was going to be printed to cassette and they told me they liked the album but that Orange Peeler sounded like a “shitty Death Cab for Cutie” song which is really funny but back then that comment burned me and I scratched the whole thing.
I was extremely insecure in my early 20s and relied on a lot of affirmation from friends and girls and had a hard time taking criticism. I’m happy the song stayed on the record though - It was part of my original vision and I should have trusted myself. I was lucky to get a second chance with the 2017 Joy Void release.
“Bagel Breath” is one of my favorite examples of the three of you leaking into each other’s work because the phrase only exists because Dimitri misheard John singing “bagel bread” in a Community College song and then asked if he could steal the mistake. Ten years later, are there other things on this record that began as somebody else’s accident, misunderstanding, or idea and have been absorbed so completely into Horse Jumper that nobody remembers whose they were anymore?
Yes this happened sometimes. The lyric “Spaceman feels good” was a misheard lyric from a Boston band I loved called The Devil and a Penny. Their song “New Song #1” had a lyric that went "Specimen fields, gold.”
“Ugly Brunette” is a reference to the Kieslowski short film “Talking Heads” where he asks a girl “Who are you?” and “What do you wish for?” and she answers “I’m an ugly brunnette” and “I’d like to have a lovely baby” . I misread the subtitle as “lonely baby.” then thought “lonely child” sounded better. The sample from I Want to Paint Horses and the end of Orange Peeler is also from that short film.
Some of the handwritten material in the anniversary booklet comes from your time working as a museum security guard. You’ve talked before about having to sneakily write things down because you weren’t supposed to have a pen or paper while you were working. Are there particular songs or lyrics on the self-titled that you can trace directly back to something you wrote while standing in one of those rooms? Looking at those notes again now, can you still remember what was happening around you when you wrote them, or has the writing completely outlived the circumstances that produced it? And were you ever actually caught writing something down that eventually became part of a song?
I remember writing the chorus of Bagel Breath in the galleries. “Borrowed my toothbrush” I had started seeing a fellow security guard at the museum. We did a shift together one night then biked straight to my house so she didn’t have any of her things and in the morning she was working again. She used my toothbrush then left. I thought it was really intimate. I was working later on and I wrote the lyric on a piece of scrap paper. I was writing a lot of lyrics about her in the galleries, things were real romantic then. I’d say besides Orange Peeler and Sun Poisoning, all of those songs were written in the galleries.
There’s a bunch of small surreal ones - one that comes to mind isn’t for the S/T but I was writing the songs for “So Divine” around the same time. For the song “Poison” there’s a lyric that goes “I opened my legs so you can crawl through” that came from some little kid running around in the galleries and he kept screaming at his dad: “open your legs so I can go through you daddy” and I just remember thinking that was really weird. I used to write things people said down.
I would get caught a lot by my boss. I used to think that job would have been awesome if you could read a book while you were standing around but now I’m happy you had to be secretive and hide what you were doing. It made it feel kind of risky.
“July 5th” is barely a minute long, and I’ve always been curious about how you decided where something like that belongs on a record. It sits between “Ugly Brunette” and “Bagel Breath,” almost like a little interruption before the album starts moving again. Was it always something you thought of as a complete song, or was it a fragment that you liked enough to leave exactly as it was? And now that you’re performing the record in its entirety, does something that short serve a different purpose onstage than it does sitting between those two songs on the record?
To me it made perfect sense being there and it feels complete because the song is just the poem and the poem is complete. I think it serves a purpose introducing some of the themes of the album. In a way the whole album is kind of based on that poem so it made sense being early on.
Jamie mentioned in an interview last year that “DIRT” is still one of their favorite older songs to play because of the space in it, and that there are nights when a room understands that space and nights when people talk through it and the song doesn’t land quite the same way. I’m curious whether playing the entire self-titled in sequence changes that relationship with the audience. By the time you reach “DIRT,” do you feel like the songs leading up to it have already taught the room how to listen to what you’re doing, or is that something you still have to negotiate every night?
Playing the album through makes that part feel really heavy once we get to it. I used to think I could negotiate with an audience but now I read the room. If we are opening for someone I usually don’t include DIRT in the setlist. If we are headlining I’ll put it on most of the time. I used to, when I was feeling like a little shit and opening for an audience that was not there to see us, play DIRT super quiet and then make it obnoxiously loud for the heavy part. And I’d play other really quiet songs to make it uncomfortable for them, like “oh you came to see a rock show and have fun? Well here’s this instead..”. It never did what I intended to do but I would feel proud that we got up there and played a song like “Stray Dog” or “DIRT” perfectly through a chatting audience.
You’ve talked before about not wanting a live show to be an exact recreation of a recording, and about older songs naturally changing as you develop as musicians. But there’s something strange about dedicating an entire tour to a record that people have spent ten years learning in one very specific form. When you started rehearsing the self-titled front to back again, were there moments where you realized the way you play something now had drifted surprisingly far from what you actually recorded? And when that happened, did you feel any responsibility to move back toward the original arrangement, or does trying to recreate the record too faithfully almost defeat the purpose of playing it ten years later?
I view recording only as a snapshot of how the song is at that time. If you continue to be a band inevitably you will move away from the recording as time goes on and you play more. I usually never listen to a track I’ve recorded ever again after it’s out, your muscle memory of the song changes through the years in the same way your normal memory changes. I listened to the S/T for the first time again only when we got the remastered version back from Greg Obis and I was like damn ok we’ve strayed from this quite a bit. We play Bagel Breath faster, we play Spaceman slower. I forgot there was this second detuned guitar in the choruses of Orange Peeler, etc. and I think my voice sounds a lot different now. As long as the core of the song is still there that’s all that matters. If you’re basing your performance on a recording you will lose the true human/ spiritual element of what it is to play an instrument and perform. I think of someone like Jonathan Richman/ The Modern Lovers - I feel like that is a dude who has probably never played a song the same exact way in his life because he’s focused on true expression.